Alberta is the only province that continues to deny
Alberta’s ~12,000 farm workers basic safety rights, such as the right to refuse
unsafe work or the right to know about dangers in their workplace. You can see
me chatting about this issue on Alberta Primetime last week here. CBC is also working on a series about this issue.
Last year, the Alberta government struck the Farm Safety
Advisory Council. This council was designed to provide the government with
advice on issues around farm safety and comprised mostly industry and
government representatives (there was one appointee from UFCW to represent the
voice of labour). Many people (including myself) saw this as a stalling tactic
by the government, which was hoping the issue of regulating farm safety in Alberta
would go away.
It hasn’t and likely won’t. Farm safety is a good wedge issue for the Liberals and the NDP. There is little
urban appetite for workplace rules that result in maimed and killed farm
workers (including kids and migrant workers). Yet, if the PCs attempt to
mollify urban voters by regulating safety, they will lose more rural support to
the Wildrose. I expect further political hammering on this issue.
In the spring, the Council provided the Minister of
Agriculture with a report about farm safety regulation. Neither the Minster of
Agriculture nor the Minister of Human Services have made any public moves on
this report (like releasing it) for seven months. On the weekend, the Calgary
Herald revealed it had a copy of a draft report, which was confirmed as broadly
representative of the final report.
The gist of the report (which I have not seen) is (not
surprisingly) that farming should remain outside the ambit of provincial OHS
laws and that industry should use education and some form of self-regulation to
make things safer. To be fair to the government, it has not taken a position on
whether or not it will live up to the commitment made by the Premier last
September to regulate farm safety. But this report is rather discouraging.
The assertion that education is a more effective way to
reduce injuries than enforcement is simply untrue. Studies indicate that farm
safety education has no impact on injury rates—likely because hazardous
conditions remain unmitigated. This recommendation ought to give the government
significant pause about adopting the council’s (self-serving) report.
The political bind for the government is that doing
something may cost significant rural support (and may set off a feud in
caucus). Yet (once again) doing nothing means the government will have the
blood of the next dead farm worker plainly on its hands. If that farm worker is
a kid (and there is a good chance a kid will die doing farm work next year),
platitudes about how the death is “tragic” and “deeply saddening” may not be
enough to sweep the issue under the carpet.
Eventually, urban voters are going
to wonder why the government keeps accepting the recommendations of the foxes
about hen-house security in the wake of all of these dead chickens.
-- Bob Barnetson
No comments:
Post a Comment