I’ve run across two studies about young workers and
workplace safety this past week that are worth a look.
“Teenage work: Its precarious and gendered nature” examines
the workplace experiences of youth in British Columbia. The author finds that BC’s
regulatory mechanisms are inadequate to deal with the working conditions faced
by BC teens. Of specific concern were the few remedies available for dangerous
working conditions, harassment, excessive or inappropriate hours of work or
problems with pay.
“Waiting for safety: Responses by young Canadian workers to unsafe work” examines how young workers in Ontario and Manitoba react to
workplace hazards using the voice, exit, patience and neglect typology. Most recent
workplace safety campaigns in Canada seek to inform young workers of their
rights and thus trigger voice activity around safety hazards. What this study
found is that young workers are reluctant to give voice to their concern
(related to fear of being fired, among other factors) and thus workers tend to
adopt patience strategies (i.e., hoping something will change). Where voice activity
is unsuccessful, young workers tend to revert to patience or adopt neglect
strategies rather than continue to agitate for change.
One common theme in these articles is that complaint-driven
enforcement of workplace rights doesn’t appear to be particularly effective or
realistic. This is not a new or particularly startling conclusion yet it is
wildly ignored by policy makers.
-- Bob Barnetson
No comments:
Post a Comment