Minister of Jobs, Skills, Training and Labour Thomas
Lukaszuk recently gave an interview to the Cold Lake Sun. On occupational
health and safety, the Sun reports:
The minister noted while much work has been done on safe and fair workplaces, he wants to see “a culture of safety” implemented via education and, if necessary, enforcement.
“Ninety-nine per cent of our employers are exemplary, but there’s always that one per cent,” he noted.
There are two difficulties with this statement.
First, 99%
of employers are not exemplary. While the government has released fewer and
fewer safety stats over the years (for example, the last inspection data available is from 2009!), we do have more recent data from inspection blitzes in 2010, 2011
and 2013:
- 2013 Sand and Gravel Crushing: 89% of 64 workplaces had one or more
- 2013 Ski Hills: 64 orders were issued at 26 workplaces had one or more violations (can’t compute percentage of noncompliance from data)
- 2011 Young Workers: 69% of 118 workplaces had one or more violations.
- 2011 Residential Construction: 55% of 380 workplaces had one or more violations
- 2011 Powered Mobile Equipment: 75% of 87 (I think) workplaces had one or more violations
- 2010 Commercial Construction: 214 orders were issued to 73 workplaces (can’t compute percentage of noncompliance from data)
Clearly it is not 1% of employers who are bad actors—the
majority of these employers are non-compliant. Some noncompliance is pretty minor (paperwork issues) but a lot os very significant and poses immediate hazards to life and limb.
Lukaszuk knows this. In 2010, he
was “disgusted” by employer non-compliance, telling the CBC:
"The hammer is coming down in Alberta and if we continue seeing numbers like these, the hammer simply will be getting bigger and bigger," he said. "I take this very seriously and I expect that this will be a wakeup call."
Fast-forward four years and, despite more talk about a hammer coming down, fatalities are at an all-time high, prosecutions at an
all-time low and the province’s new fines are clearly a paper tiger.
The real question here is why is Lukaszuk misrepresenting
employers’ degree of compliance with the OHS Code?
Did Lukaszuk forget
about the inspections that so incensed him in 2010 and 2011? Or did he forget
about the ever-growing fatality numbers he railed against in early February of
2014?
Or is there another agenda at work here?
My guess is that politicians are very uncomfortable about
workplace injuries and deaths. Yet they are also uncomfortable sending
inspectors to worksites (which are often owned by Tory supporters).
If
confronted with bad news, they will rail against employers maiming and killing
voters. But absent such news, they tend to dole out sunshine and lollipops in
the hopes everyone will forget the workers who die each year.
The second difficulty with Lukaszuk’s statement is that
education clearly doesn’t work. The government has been educating (in lieu of
enforcement) since 1995 and fatality rates (about the best proxy we have for
safety in Alberta) keep going up. There is no good reason to think education is
going to be effective.
Education is a favourite remedy for Tory MLAs because it places the blame for injuries on workers (who apparently need education), sounds enlightened and
makes few demands of employers. This is, however, likely cold comfort to the
family and friends of the at least 188 Albertans who died last year as a result
of their job.
-- Bob Barnetson
1 comment:
An updated ski hill inspection report is here: http://work.alberta.ca/documents/2014-ski-hills-focused-inspection-report.pdf
CTV reports the number of orders dropped by 59% but it still isn't possible to compute compliance rates: http://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/workplace-safety-infractions-drop-at-alberta-ski-hills-report-says-1.1720831
While there is lots of sunshine and lollipops in the press, it should be noted that there were still 16 orders, half of them quite serious:
"The inspection results indicate four areas of legislation are responsible for 47% of all orders. These four areas are equipment use and maintenance (Part 3, section 12); fire and explosions (Part 10, section 171) relating to compressed /liquefied gas containers; noise exposure (Part 16, section 219) worker exposure to noise; and safeguards (Part 22, section 310) relating to protecting workers from moving parts of equipment."
Post a Comment